From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  3 20:28:50 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52A2106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 20:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46AA8FC1D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 20:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id DBF1E5C34; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0500
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Message-ID: <20080303203300.GD68644@atarininja.org>
References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de>
	<20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.>
	<47CC26F3.7020709@cyberbotx.com>
	<20080303170457.02959c09@gumby.homeunix.com.>
	<20080303172750.GB65151@atarininja.org>
	<924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:28:50 -0000

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> 
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> 
>> I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
>> /etc/mail/mailer.conf.
> 
> I'll take that as a bug report :-)

I didn't intend for that to be a bug report.  :)

> Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH.  And does BATCH 
> apply to package install as well?

Honestly, I have not put much thought into it.  I was just pointing out
that some ports require post-installation questions to be answered.

Thanks for your work on postfix, it's always just worked for me.

-- WXS