From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 16:54:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD70E1065676 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leandro.magnabosco@fcdl-sc.org.br) Received: from mail.cdl-sc.org.br (mail.cdl-sc.org.br [189.39.224.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB418FC1F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.200.189]) by mail.cdl-sc.org.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B69263764; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:35:24 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <4ABB9FC9.3060006@fcdl-sc.org.br> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:35:21 -0300 From: Leandro Quibem Magnabosco Organization: FCDL/SC User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gonzalo Nemmi References: <200909241238.15457.gnemmi@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200909241238.15457.gnemmi@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAMMER FS port (status ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:54:26 -0000 I think that one questions pops into the minds of a lot of people right now: Why not just use DragonFly BSD? It is a pretty decent system. Why do you need it to be FreeBSD w/ Hammer and not DragonFly BSD? Maybe there are some reasons, but I don't see it. Could anybody point it out for me? Thank you. -- Leandro Quibem Magnabosco.