From owner-cvs-all Tue Mar 31 18:08:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA17264 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:08:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sag.space.lockheed.com (sag.space.lockheed.com [192.68.162.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA17182; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:07:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from handy@sag.space.lockheed.com) Received: from localhost by sag.space.lockheed.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/21Nov95-0423PM) id AA13194; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:07:39 -0800 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:07:39 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Handy To: "David O'Brien" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/mgv Makefile ports/print/mgv/patches patch-ac In-Reply-To: <19980331122246.50218@nuxi.com> Message-Id: X-Files: The truth is out there Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >> Did you actually try compiling this on a -STABLE box with the 3.0 >> makefile? I did, it turns out. > >Yes I did. But when using the 3.0 Makefile on -STABLE, the about box >claims it was built on a 3.0 system which is *obviously* wrong. I'll try again. Did you break compiling on -CURRENT for a lousy "about" box??? Does this seem like a reasonable exchange to you? >> Unless you have compelling evidence otherwise, please back the makefile >> selection out. > >1. Ports track -STABLE >2. when I looked for a MAINTIER in the Makefile, I didn't see one. So I > felt justified in making the change. ABOUT boxes don't have to track -STABLE :-) Happy trails Brian Proto-Doctor o' Physics To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message