Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:14:53 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Florian Smeets <flo@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/asterisk & sqlite* usage... Message-ID: <20120320151453.GA63274@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4F689B0F.9020608@freebsd.org> References: <20120320143808.GA69351@DataIX.net> <4F689B0F.9020608@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 03:58:23PM +0100, Florian Smeets wrote: > On 20.03.2012 15:38, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > Attempting to understand why asterisk needs two versions of sqlite > > and why even if sqlite3 is found sqlite2 is installed anyway... > > > > This behavior does not seem to be quite correct and seems there > > should be some (if) statements here to determine whether sqlite3 is > > installed and then fallback and check to see if sqlite2 is > > installed and if none are then inform the user and fall back to one > > or the other as the default. > > > > There are modules that require sqlite2 (res_config_sqlite, cdr_sqlite) > and others that require sqlite3 (cdr_sqlite3, cel_sqlite3). > > BTW, in asterisk 10 sqlite3 is mandatory as they use it instead of BDB > now. Sweet! good news. I have not been keeping up on this near as much as I should. Thanks for the feedback. > > Florian -- ;s =;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120320151453.GA63274>