From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 14:52:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790C21065677 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057978FC25 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KYiqv-0006Y9-Ns for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:01 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:01 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:51:49 +0200 Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <2b5f066d0808280705y3454c188v768efe46b388864b@mail.gmail.com> <2b5f066d0808280743g69c32d1rd30aee0ca276125@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig69D26AE0D395E8B4B85C7A70" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d0808280743g69c32d1rd30aee0ca276125@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal & fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig69D26AE0D395E8B4B85C7A70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian McCann wrote: > Yes...I apologize...I did that when I built the file system with > "newfs -J". Here's the tunefs -p output for one of the file systems: >=20 > # tunefs -p /dev/da2.journal > tunefs: ACLs: (-a) disabled > tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled > tunefs: soft updates: (-n) disabled > tunefs: gjournal: (-J) enabled > tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 2048 > tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 > tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 > tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8% > tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) time > tunefs: volume label: (-L) >=20 > I'm concerned about this because the ones I've had problems with > recently are 1.1TB arrays...I've got 2 8.6TB arrays that are journaled > as well...and if I ever have to fsck them...that could take 1/2 the > day... >=20 > Any other thoughts? Ok. There was one person that complained about fsck on gjournal but not in the same context - he created the journal for gjournal on an existing file system and so destroyed a part of the data. I don't think this is related to your case. Does gjournal complain about your drive, for example that it doesn't support BIOFLUSH? Also, did fsck actually do something when it was started (did it find anything corrupted)? --------------enig69D26AE0D395E8B4B85C7A70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFItruFldnAQVacBcgRAjDiAKD6XHUCyxxJdWVrd7EzluEEpWrYjQCfdvEk OjSgJSp7uossW4PCa3pAcPU= =dXql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig69D26AE0D395E8B4B85C7A70--