Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 18:28:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 283175] graphics/materialx: MaterialX is an open standard for the exchange of rich material. Message-ID: <bug-283175-7788-p5g7jaXfrq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-283175-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-283175-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D283175 Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |diizzy@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> --- Outdated patch? https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/MaterialX/releases Is there a reason to why we can't upstream release archive? https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#makefile-master_si= tes-github Explain reasoning behind DISTVERSIONSUFFIX Why port locked to Python 3.11? GH_TUPLE+=3D should be GH_TUPLE=3D (see Porters Handbook) if needed because= of the above CMAKE_ARGS+=3D should be CMAKE_ARGS and you can probably use CMAKE_ON/OFF i= nstead Why is CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX defined? Sort Makefile entries, why is USE_GL=3D USE_XORG=3D placed at the end? ${CP} shouldn't be used in do-install, see Porters Handbook Overall I'd say no to adding more ports for you to maintain given that you a bunch outdated without patches already. https://portscout.freebsd.org/freebsd@sysctl.cz.html --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283175-7788-p5g7jaXfrq>