Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:27:56 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <arch@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fw: /rescue Message-ID: <20030512182756.GA21663@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030509134921.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030509063210.GA16323@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.20030509134921.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > Why?? /stand is the static bits you start with. 'make world' is free to > > expand and update them. > > make world doesn't even know it exists. /stand isn't present in > /etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist make world and /etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist doesn't know about your /rescue either. I guess we're done then. Lets go eBay'ing. > > If not, then please have sysinstall rm -rf /stand. > > *shrug*, it is an artifact that has proved useful in the past for > system recovery. If /rescue becomes a reality then I would have no > problem with /stand being removed after a successful install. Uh? The /rescue you refer to will be used for system recovery. I'm not sure there is any question that we need to switch to dynamic / for NSS, PAM, new protocols, support for LDAP, etc...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512182756.GA21663>