From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 25 10:55:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18905 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:55:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA18879 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:54:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #3) id 0y7lyd-0006dJ-00; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:54:43 -0800 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:54:40 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "Viren R. Shah" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server In-Reply-To: <199802251846.NAA05311@rstcorp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Viren R. Shah wrote: > > We just got a server in that will be acting as our main NFS server. We > intend to run 2.2.x on it. Couple of questions: > > 1. Is 2.2.6 close enough that we should put off installing 2.2-STABLE > for a few days? Or in other terms, are there enough stability > improvements in 2.2.6 that we should definitely wait for it. Probably best to install now, and begin testing. If you need 2.2.6, it is just a "make world" away. > 2. I've seen a few mentions of NFS problems on 2.2.5. Are there any > big gotchas wrt using a 2.2.x box as an NFS server? Most NFS comments have been about freebsd-current. Best thing is to test first. > Thanks > Viren > -- > Viren R. Shah > "Creeping featurism is a disease, fatal if not treated promptly" > -- Don Norman in _The Design of Everyday Things_ Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message