From owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Wed Mar 3 03:20:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F99955AAC6 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dqzl60Qf1z4XTg for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id cw15so10287209qvb.11 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:20:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G82nZB1qjjdOmSzV3pBP7dqcm/bpWcuHpub2Bd3X7yU=; b=Ib/7ziK+rSw0DzE6WWU47G55cbiv1NcNFhoYctXhnWUXSEga0Bk7C0u/kj6JnDrt+j ugdLSiWkGzgUQTu9YtlNdYFBSqslWStPL94Kxu2yy5Dp4C0Mu2k9JPr8BoahlrpR3QOT SMvlIzpsdINggmzvxwTJL8kAA6uCR/QImIsg2jkur3uLW20vyDImUezzjb1hV9g/NtG7 ktnF5SVzg5DXWjuiLWKwsCk7Ignw8E6F2vy8hQvOxOtsVWHvhClzTnusm+xl+D1mP+fu jiASBZYm/KvRYgOWBWXWJifDpADjWUTo5VM5eTY1/jkndxtraR8/SYC7FXKLwpJhYI/J 8EHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G82nZB1qjjdOmSzV3pBP7dqcm/bpWcuHpub2Bd3X7yU=; b=IU+OJ/r7V0TFIfd857F9TQP2JSlxF6yZTXKgVq5JgbAWYPX1XMN31ZVIFscEPmGayc ZmA2DLCfq5eJSOQv4udZcENIRCsDNUv/U8z28ujl/7IkUabtAXd+eDDjHnTGZ3zYlfg6 m2Hhfw2TRTkzWjZFl8ndSC1sGnNfhE23DAMrL9l3IHCmwerUFB0UaNdOB5biguXJCXDf QiXV1R2XuGsKQLxyQp3ARELNQQEGff5f0+rvfNxPRBsiq0b+bN5hHTokx/FeR77MGfyM U3jJZtDEt4Z9/VEyRzW8OQ44HPezh4UmB6G5ViU9bY2mWFDcHaWT7LE4aIjvuU67Rqf+ B37w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eUwH0ggf8U6p6rplDMmCRaFsfqnp6GYg4g7Nu0KHfnIz4spQM sK4WZSuN7bsaOkjWfyltBO0R5aG9F8e9S6ZiUOWiHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/7qNC3LgUN/CQKJECX/SXr1yjU9y9LDsGW1YFpP6yFIjye4PgUI/U8RFrYsY62Q+7+z4HwmcZYMAH2r5IMsc= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a954:: with SMTP id z20mr886084qva.29.1614741600932; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:20:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202103021856.122IuYgV048086@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <3d947e4c-a529-0b27-a8d7-415600783e53@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:19:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 2c26d77d989a - main - Remove /boot/efi from mtree, missed in 0b7472b3d8d2. To: Ed Maste Cc: Nathan Whitehorn , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Brandon Bergren , src-committers , "" , dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Dqzl60Qf1z4XTg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 03:20:02 -0000 On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 7:01 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 19:30, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > There has been some talk of moving the mount point to /efi, but I think > that went nowhere... > > I thought about /efi based on arguments from the Linux world, more > info at > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_system_partition#Typical_mount_points > . > I did open https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28814 to move the existing > uses to /efi. That said, I'm much more interested in us picking > something and using it in the installer/other tooling than whether > it's /boot/efi or /efi. > Me too. I am actually open to either. If I had a do over, I'd pick /efi honestly. But the directory presence or absence shouldn't be used to know if we have an ESP to deal with or not. Warner >