Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 14:36:24 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jdp@polstra.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os Message-ID: <199904080436.OAA11412@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Actually, they don't. Compiler-specific options can be put in ${CC}. >> Perhaps they even should be. > >But in this case, we want "-Os" (egcs) or "-O2" (gcc) only for >building boot -- not for everything. It could be parameterized with >make macros like "OPT_SMALL" and "OPT_FAST" in the *.mk files, I >suppose. "CC+=-Os" in individual Makefiles works about as well as "CFLAGS+=-Os" for adding flags. That's not very well. Removing unwanted additions is hard. BTW, boot2/Makefile uses "CFLAGS=" to override any previous definition of CFLAGS. This may break `make world' by removing -nostdinc. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904080436.OAA11412>