From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jun 22 17:33:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA00382 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 17:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aak.anchorage.net (ai-136.anchorage.net [207.14.72.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00376 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 17:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (abc@localhost) by aak.anchorage.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA15793 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:22:08 -0800 (AKDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aak.anchorage.net: abc owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:22:07 -0800 (AKDT) From: Steve Howe X-Sender: abc@aak.anchorage.net To: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Handbook - ascii form?? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk i think everyone is missing the point! no one is looking for instructions on how-to generate an ASCII Handbook on a BSD machine! some of us wish an ASCII version was available 1. for DOS users that can't "col -b" and "more" with highlights they don't have, etc. 2. for people they don't like clicking around HTML pages for little bits (hard to print also). 3. for people that aren't doing postscript. i think it is rude when people are FORCED to make do with proprietary/non-ASCII formats. the government, for example forces you to have MS Word to read their docs or apply for some things. ASCII can be read by any computer/OS, and i think all docs should contain at least one ASCII version. ------------------------------------------------- FingerPrint BA09868C 1B995204 58410FD3 A5E7B2DA http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/way/7747 -------------------------------------------------