Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:05:27 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept Message-ID: <47F572EE-B5E5-4961-81C5-179AD0F4A90A@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100331140415.GB68231@mx.techwires.net> References: <D1EDB040-BB1F-41E2-8E1B-9DEF6171903D@gmail.com> <p2xf19c444a1003310624r68579888jdddb0237d8da4b3f@mail.gmail.com> <63B143BF-20C9-425F-8969-B7452191E84F@freebsd.org> <20100331140415.GB68231@mx.techwires.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: >>> This looks great! >>> Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some >>> arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_update()? >> >> Not really. I'll probably switch them to ints at some point. > > Hmm, I somehow like the idea of not passing integers here. Looking at > ath_rate/sample it passes a struct. I don't know whether this can be > rewritten though. It can be rewritten to pass ints, from what I understand. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47F572EE-B5E5-4961-81C5-179AD0F4A90A>