Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:29:53 -0500
From:      "Steve Douville" <fbsd@douville.net>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IP Routing Question
Message-ID:  <006a01c6322b$862bfc90$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1>
References:  <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1><43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net><000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1><43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net><001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2361C.7080400@mykitchentable.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, the solution ended up just setting up the rule for the subnet, not the 
host...
route add aaa.bbb.ccc.200/29 aaa.bbb.ccc.200 -interface

Had to move some IP addresses, but at least the traffic is going to the 
right ethernet controller now.

Thanks for the help!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net>
To: "Steve Douville" <fbsd@douville.net>
Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question


On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote:
> By default, it sets the netif to em0
>

OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.200'?
And if that doesn't work, can I please see 'netstat -rn'?  You can
obfuscate the IPs if you wish.

Cheers,

Drew

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net>
> To: "Steve Douville" <steve@douville.net>
> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
>
>
> On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote:
>
>> Weird stuff...
>> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1
>>
>>
>
> What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Drew
>
>
>> doesn't work even if i've already set
>> aaa.bbb.ccc.196   link#2  em1
>>
>> The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The 
>> only
>> way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, 
>> unsuccessfully,
>> creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route
>> change
>> command to move it to link#2.
>>
>> it'd be much easier if i could just type
>> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1
>> but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses 
>> it
>> in the table by default!!
>>
>> Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net>
>> To: "Steve Douville" <fbsd@douville.net>
>> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
>>
>>
>>
>> What happens with a simple 'route add <certain ip address>
>> aaa.bbb.ccc.196?  Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve?
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Drew
>>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006a01c6322b$862bfc90$6501a8c0>