From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Mar 13 1:38:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE1237B718; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:38:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA95619; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:38:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200103130938.KAA95619@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Disk I/O problem in 4.3-BETA In-Reply-To: <20010313013301.L29888@fw.wintelcom.net> from Alfred Perlstein at "Mar 13, 2001 01:33:01 am" To: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:38:30 +0100 (CET) Cc: mwm@mired.org (Mike Meyer), Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com (Helge Oldach), oberman@es.net, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Having write caching on is like having the disk ignore _any_ > filesystem's attempt to do softupdates/logging/delayed-order-writes > because the disk _lies_ to the OS about when a write is safely on > the disk. Hmm, I think the problem here is that the OS doesn't tell the drivers WHEN it expects to have data written to disk, I can't see why it should not be possible to have even softupdates say "now before I write this I expect everything so far to be on disk". -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message