From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 09:57:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7DB16A422 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233B443D5C for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717AC1A3C2D; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A842D51588; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 04:56:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 04:56:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmytro Surovtsev Message-ID: <20051123095651.GB91931@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4384512E.5060605@buc.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CdrF4e02JqNVZeln" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4384512E.5060605@buc.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:57:10 -0000 --CdrF4e02JqNVZeln Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:23:26AM +0000, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option.=20 > Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile=20 > without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like=20 > many years. I do not think that racing for issuing the new RELEASE (so=20 > called in this case) in proper time costs the reliability and robustness= =20 > we all appreciated all theese years. I find this comment very disrespectful to the many people who worked for the past year on 6.0-RELEASE, and who spent nearly 6 months during the release cycle to polish it and fix bugs. Kris --CdrF4e02JqNVZeln Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhDzjWry0BWjoQKURAtJkAKDlLznOf9IfGeiNcbRNW6g6T7/t/ACghX/k 1TmvUFJDGznyNg29pqPPHqg= =YIbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CdrF4e02JqNVZeln--