From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 31 12:28:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA14949 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA14943 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:28:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA06948; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 15:27:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 15:27:48 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199812312027.PAA06948@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alex Zepeda Cc: "Brian W. Buchanan" , current Subject: Re: egcs chokes on netinet/in.h.. In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Perhaps, but it's still technically broken code No. It is perfectly correct, Standard C code. It is not C++ code, nor does it claim to be. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message