Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:57:49 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <20041019165749.GA33059@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416DA856.9040703@vbservices.net> <20041015093908.GA11176@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 :
> Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie
> get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well.
I agree that this would be nice, but I do not see it as a prerequisite
to modularizing atapicam.
> know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the
> time to chime in if thats the case.
Where are we standing with this effort? Who is working on it currently,
and what has been implemented already?
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041019165749.GA33059>