From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 21:19:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CB31065674 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054A68FC1A for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so5099768obb.13 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=fW6F3ztg184N2luyVwF3adNlUJNchMuIqpZZhzY0rC4=; b=doFjDANRJGrA2mIh1o2u0Jd5i0L2ppvZTFQ2VQxNUwUw9HaQUWsLgbTZNpDrsyM8lB EIaQw+svasst2sEHrvjKiiU6Q0tSrruxmCZgdpHzi8HOqmsdb/EFMHLlt1ydrAnQecpV zWDvNx1b+SpZEvv5VAuGbu/hYeGWttJdjAyeE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=fW6F3ztg184N2luyVwF3adNlUJNchMuIqpZZhzY0rC4=; b=olRv7zcAlWTQFPYVoYoJTz0RGoBIOVko4EBq6St53YtDdbQGkXUylJALLaDpVCsfpW ohCmaR9zzJWaNPGqSOANOtp5+L5h7y2EUtfSR1ZMbX1zvURGpUuTkHeEXRfSpAOXUnJL X/FZKacTPCeAREbnwi1+2yGp+xVf2KRi/Suj3bH/JfIIiFulnYC/8Ry7SRMFez03oHgM AWW6hSJD6DMXdvbOAF+7+6sBVOkHH020RuhIEN5cPL4IP3SPbUE9oOstIS8sm+AMaLNY Ii3MkGfs/yYc5OalNQwKC0RDz57Hplo7ncIwQAtyfWoM0c/PWHq/7ZzunkhUOAt7CxaC AGxQ== Received: by 10.60.20.233 with SMTP id q9mr7052005oee.57.1340486352644; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.125.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:18:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FE2315C.50706@FreeBSD.org> <4FE2F673.2080201@FreeBSD.org> <4FE518FB.1000802@FreeBSD.org> <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:18:42 -0700 Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiwCDS3oRUF0G+Hy0PRkBXjmEfvnNFGPtWYY+zN93OfNsLHMABI040ecX+VbFoLyM+lugF Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:19:13 -0000 On 22 June 2012 23:48, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/22/2012 20:14, Eitan Adler wrote: >> I don't oppose build patches for FreeBSD when the program otherwise >> works, but the ports collection is not a software development >> repository. > > There are a non-trivial number of examples to the contrary. Such as? > Not to > mention that there is actually no reason for us not to have our own > stuff in ports. Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we continue development of third party software by means of patches to the ports tree? -- Eitan Adler