From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 06:57:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97DC16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub1.midco.net (mailhub1.midco.net [24.220.0.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521A243D39 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:57:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 3751 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2004 14:57:21 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Mar 2004 14:57:21 -0000 Message-ID: <40507E50.504@bis.midco.net> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:57:20 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian FREISLICH References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: I like SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:57:22 -0000 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > In my opinion ULE is not yet ready for prime-time. Perhaps it > doesn't affect UP or is even more efficient with UP, but I thought > it was originally tabled as the new scheduler to make the SMP case > more efficient, which it certainly does not. > Don't worry, Ian. Nobody thinks ULE is ready for prime-time. Jeff Roberson really hasn't done anything publically with it since December--that I know of, but I imagine he's got something In The Works. Pete...