From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 20:02:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A5F6BE for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 20:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5781605 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 20:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrwQT-0003eM-Dl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:02:33 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:02:33 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:02:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: FB 9.1 boot loader problem in VirtualBox Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 20:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <50E96648.6090303@FreeBSD.org> <20130106203446.19ba863b.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:02:22 -0000 Polytropon edvax.de> writes: > ... > However, your transition of this knowledge to the terminology > to be used in combination with _virtual_ machines makes sense. > Maybe that wording is really not optimal. "Kill guest" matches > today's understanding, but could possibly be formed better in > regards of future use (like the power off vs. shutdown difference > that was totally clear in the 1990's, but maybe isn't as clear > anymore today). > Well, I remember some time ago there were some changes done to shutdown, halt, poweroff commands and their interpretation/implementation. Since then Confusion Reigns Supreme ! See Google search: difference shutdown poweroff Enjoy it -:) jb