From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Dec 17 22:40:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3934A4B6C7 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6878111A4 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p187so40927943wmp.1 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s+/llGBKF2GE5NLeSndQDJQwcf8OoJXhJynnFIVjJJA=; b=UqXLKL/0ttizzXlUooYa7xFYaJ0t04z/vXv4UtPDUD8qv5FiKR7bgpTd6oS+E+5k7b vYs28h38fKVJyOZrUnCdSAsCgDdTyo0mQ8iGSKvSmI9w00l0eTt0gSldBhcW3oy3QyaG IAsQr9FeALIVvxsTTu89654yBJOclnB0H8iUVm8smgsuAz4MRS/+sdnWf4gVg/D0d0op Qc4OLa3DHsEAUfBPaXg8KU6sCezPyBXXur3X4ob+L9px54Ml/rgH9Xmn7iqUdsHSuRmX F4KtlJv3F7hovho+IU7qTNgcEJnZewd7K3C3WsrfQdeabEG4e5RUbDx0yym6XYPyKIWK HjSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s+/llGBKF2GE5NLeSndQDJQwcf8OoJXhJynnFIVjJJA=; b=Ok8+KzBtWfADuHYrItFl6pa7TMGGmpB4KKzaG3qSv/ENjSXdMF6qAvxMFB19Vab0LS DRipVxnvHylE76Y4CRM3AfDIbCa0eo9IoUlqenzJGoKq3VbWcZN8Ld48mlppBNSP0WC6 zkix1RPnuWnJxsmqZ5PzFZjizmNbBiJFZ984ypZBDP5qEv1dpMbJbtkX2TI+oLjQZGe/ Y3pCSCPCyVsOghGiPg16icIOISSj+k+b0vUU1yYorM8MoSXBHTGw/C6lRMy6S3zZMCz4 MGjxlAcMreAI2lNPXtmZzVBWNJGy+yzhKucxHw7060bgaGkxnYg0RVdfeVwbAQN6nEIo ry+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcYPyIetJrimJhTypWXGDSff7wJGnvAqKDItCtsN5gdwQd+MTAtvzL/HQc7A9bgjBRikA6aJjsV+R6kmPwVuQw3+XFsA== X-Received: by 10.28.217.139 with SMTP id q133mr7011492wmg.3.1450392027915; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:40:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.58] (liv3d.labs.multiplay.co.uk. [82.69.141.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dl8sm12322478wjb.29.2015.12.17.14.40.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:40:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r292379 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <201512162226.tBGMQSvs098886@repo.freebsd.org> <20151217003824.GG42340@FreeBSD.org> <5672C6AE.7070407@freebsd.org> <20151217185731.GK42340@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org From: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <567339DA.3020000@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:40:26 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151217185731.GK42340@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:40:30 -0000 On 17/12/2015 18:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Steven, > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:29:02PM +0000, Steven Hartland wrote: > S> Hey Gleb, sorry I didn't wait for your review, but I did ask around on what > S> the timeout for this would be and was informed 2 weeks and as it had been > S> over a month, with quite a bit of feedback from others in the area, all > S> of which > S> had been addressed I thought that was reasonable. > S> > S> A simple reply of "I do intend to review but don't have time yet so > S> please wait" > S> I think would be useful in these types of situations, as I know > S> everyone's busy > S> but its impossible to know what others are thinking. > > Of course it is my fault that I don't review everything phabricator sends > to me, which is a lot. Because it is so easy to add a bunch of subscribers > to a revision. However, in the good old pre-phabricator times, people used to > send email directly to each other. Those email arrive to my regular mailbox, > which I check as often as I can. You could ping me via email. Ooo, do you not get the chase emails done in phabricator then, as that's what I used? My apologies if that's the case.