Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:20:20 +0100 From: Samir <samir.otmane@numericable.fr> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD but without jail Message-ID: <62dff777-c0fa-44b1-82d9-6a0ea428b5e9@numericable.fr> In-Reply-To: <202512021359.5B2Dx4VL075037@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <f410fd52-cb62-4304-a74d-db31179a2459@numericable.fr> <8C497C07-E01C-47E3-93A5-4CD44141E6C2@freebsd.org> <202512021359.5B2Dx4VL075037@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/2/25 14:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Moin Rahman writes: > > >> You can build your system with the following in your `src.conf` >> WITHOUT_JAIL=yes > That only prevents the userland programs notably jail(8) from being > built. The kernel support for jails is tightly integrated, not > controlled by an option. > > I dont think anybody has ever suggested, there even might be > a measurable performance impact, so I'm a bit puzzled as to > the goal might be here ? > Well, I have to agree with you that the code overhead is *highly* negligible, that was just a suggestion. no problem if would be too complicated to do so, please excuse me. Samir
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62dff777-c0fa-44b1-82d9-6a0ea428b5e9>