From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 20:33:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC59B16A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:33:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.snowfall.se (guldivar.globalwire.se [212.112.184.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9A543D39 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@snowfall.se) Received: from [213.136.48.101] (unknown [213.136.48.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.snowfall.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A2E1321F; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:33:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <420BC512.2060403@snowfall.se> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:33:22 +0100 From: Stefan Cars User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev References: <20050209205943.34c39e15.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org> <420BBAAD.4030109@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <420BBAAD.4030109@portaone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: MySQL benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:33:26 -0000 Hi! I'm a bit interested in why FreeBSD is so much worse than NetBSD (and Linux) on UP and also on some SMP ? Could someone give a pretty simple answer to that or is the question to complex ? /S