From owner-freebsd-sparc Mon Jul 9 23: 2: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from softweyr.com (softweyr.com [208.247.99.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0798D37B401; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 23:02:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from localhost.softweyr.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=softweyr.com ident=528b3bd3ee08731dcf1614ed448a1759) by softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15JqgH-0000BC-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:07:33 -0600 Message-ID: <3B4A9BA5.35DC189E@softweyr.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:07:33 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Robert Drehmel , freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port progress note References: <20010709105328.A1149@obelix.develop.ferrari.net> <20010709020809.E15863@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010709112918.A1309@obelix.develop.ferrari.net> <20010709040921.A94419@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David O'Brien wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:29:18AM +0200, Robert Drehmel wrote: > > > > In which ways will V9 and V10 differ? I just think that > > we cannot support every future 64 bit SPARC architecture > > with one port. > > I disagree. NetBSD seems to be supporting a great number of SPARC32 systems with one system image. Perhaps they know some tricks we should be looking at? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message