Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:41:38 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Cc: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sup's Freefall-centric tree conventions Message-ID: <11006.818646098@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 10 Dec 1995 11:53:33 CST." <199512101753.LAA23540@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I did precisely this, I used "/sup/current" "/sup/stable", etc. as the base > for my sup operation here, and these are actually symlinks into my /ftp > tree, so everything magically works. This sounds reasonable to me - I definitely agree that we need to standardise this and not simply continue to saddle ourselves with freefall's historical baggage. I had the situation come up today where Richard wanted a sup connection and I figured I'd direct him at our first mirror, sup2.freebsd.org. Unfortunately, I had absolutely no idea what to tell him concerning which prefix values to use and had to refer him on to the site's maintainer (Paul Traina). We need to standardise this now or our 6 planned mirrors will all be wildly divergent. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11006.818646098>