Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:16:16 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh2-nox11 vs vid=594ad3c5-a39b-11da-926c-0800209adf0e Message-ID: <20060306131616.A88082@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20060306103204.C51066@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>; from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua on Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:43:33AM %2B0200 References: <20060306103204.C51066@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:43:33AM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > I've noticed the freshly-added entry in vuln.xml regarding SSH.COM SFTP > server vulnerability (vid=594ad3c5-a39b-11da-926c-0800209adf0e) only by > inspecting cvs-ports. Portaudit doesn't show my ssh2-nox11-3.2.9.1_3 > packages as being vulnerable. Isn't this an overlook in vuln.xml entry? Yes, is. I've just added the ssh2-nox11 slave port to the list of affected ports. Thanks for the pointer. Marius -- This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter. This product is licensed for non-commercial use. See www.antivir.de for details.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060306131616.A88082>