Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:55:12 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror Requirements - Last question? Message-ID: <3F183480.5040501@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20030718174703.GC9029@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20030718174703.GC9029@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ken Smith wrote:
> There are one or two dangling loose ends but I think the only remaining
> big question I have is whether or not to require Official Mirrors to
> carry both the "Production Release" and the "New Technology Release"
> (the terms come from the top-level Web page, 4.8 and 5.1 respectively
> at the moment).
>
> How about "Primary Mirrors" must carry both, "Secondary Mirrors" are
> only required to carry the latest Production Release? If that doesn't
> seem reasonable let us know.
>
> Thoughts from everyone welcome but it would be nice if re@ voiced an
> opinion. :-)
Seems reasonable to me. Including the part about re@ voicing an opinion. :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
dcs@tcoip.com.br
Outros:
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net
A newly-wed man of Peru
Found himself in a terrible stew:
His wife was in bed
Much deader than dead,
And so he had no one to screw.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F183480.5040501>