From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  6 21:01:46 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5103E785
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2012 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4EC8FC0A
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2012 21:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA6L1iuX035102;
 Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:01:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <50997AB8.40607@rawbw.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:01:44 -0800
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121023 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg@evilcode.net>
Subject: Re: pgbench performance is lagging compared to Linux and DragonflyBSD?
References: <50980ADD.4010402@rawbw.com>
 <CAGH67wScvnE7gYzVVtfehYbVfM465vrLjP9bX4KXSp8Sq-25mA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50994FE0.2070205@rawbw.com>
 <CANY-Wm9nTPy5A3Eygb4BQmz60a8ose--3veoQHwFj3p66BFB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANY-Wm9nTPy5A3Eygb4BQmz60a8ose--3veoQHwFj3p66BFB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:01:46 -0000

On 11/06/2012 11:10, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> Single and multi-socket hardware are not really directly comparable in
> PostgreSQL tests.

So if the CPUs are split between sockets, would such system generally 
perform better or worse with PostgeSQL vs. non-split situation?

Yuri