From owner-freebsd-standards Mon Apr 22 17:23:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [216.254.138.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3FA37B417 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mike@localhost) by espresso.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3N0MvD85584; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:22:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:22:57 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: Peter Avalos Cc: "Tim J. Robbins" , freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: df -t option Message-ID: <20020422202257.B72727@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020422175047.A37860@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020423001418.GA896@theshell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020423001418.GA896@theshell.com>; from pavalos@theshell.com on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:14:18PM -0700 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Avalos writes: > I think it should be implemented as the standard says, and move the > current -t to some other option (-T seems good). If it is done this way > I would not recommend a MFC. I believe having standard options is the > way to go. I agree. In -stable, -T could become an alias for -t, and using -t instead of -T could result in a warning noting its deprecated status. I did something similar when I added the -p option to whois(1). Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message