From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jul 11 21:24:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA29434 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:24:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA29423 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:24:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA02319; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807120424.VAA02319@implode.root.com> To: "Frank Pawlak" cc: Brett Glass , Greg Lehey , Pat Lynch , Wes Peters , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, jasone@canonware.com, smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com Subject: Re: Microsoft's breaches of contract (was: FBSD license and multiple copyright holders) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Jul 1998 03:59:53 -0000." <980712035953.ZM14961@darkstar.connect.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:24:24 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> I think we're misunderstanding each other. I was suggesting that >> somebody (not me :-) should try to get Microslop to adhere to the >> license conditions and declare that their software includes >> Berkeley-derived programs. Actually, I think I'd rather that they didn't declare that their software contains Berkeley code; it would only tarish our own reputation when people incorrectly think that BSD code is at fault in their flakey software. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message