Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 1997 17:13:45 -0800
From:      Jin Guojun (ITG staff) <jin@george.lbl.gov>
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject:   Re: kern.securelevel auto from 0 to 1 ?bug/feature?
Message-ID:  <199712020113.RAA15933@george.lbl.gov>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
}> The secure level should do nothing
}> with Xserver AT ALL.
} 
}It _should not_, but go and read my mail again.  The fact that it
}actually _does_ is an artifact of the current design how the Xserver
}works.  Frankly, it's extending an interface that's normally in the
}kernel's domain (direct hardware access) out into userland.  This
}requires full access to the hardware from the Xserver process, which
}violates the normal security layering of unix.
}
}In `secure' mode, this violation will be prevented, since there's a
}huge potential to abuse it in other ways.  Since, as you point out,
}secure mode is mainly intended for network server machines, the
}ability to still run an Xserver without any limitation is probably not
}the prime criterion for those admins operating such a server, given
}the security risk the low-level hardware access involves.
}
}Unless you're willing to donate several thousands of hours to redesign
}and rewrite the entire X11 DDX layer for the x86 architecture, i don't
}see how this will be change within the forseeable future.

Does this mean that all machines running X have to run at insecure mode?

-Jin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712020113.RAA15933>