Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 19:05:29 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.19990714190320.04556180@localhost> In-Reply-To: <000001bece5d$1a099ab0$021d85d1@youwant.to> References: <4.2.0.58.19990714182909.045589a0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:58 PM 7/14/99 -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > Regardless, two FreeBSD-3.2 machines running different 'distributions' are >probably going to be a lot more alike than two Linux-2.0.36 machines running >different distributions. > > My belief is that this is both a good thing and a bad thing. It could be either! It depends upon the way in which those systems are alike. For example, if the userland commands are similar, it's less likely that a person who runs or administers one will have trouble with another. But it's also good to have distributions tailored for different needs. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19990714190320.04556180>