From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 09:46:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC04016A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:46:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F39F43D1F for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:46:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reso3w83@verizon.net) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out008.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050201094637.SVBN20133.out008.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com> for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:46:37 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2894A2CE85E; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 01:42:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 01:42:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502010235.j112ZMCb021366@smtp2.server.rpi.edu> <200501311931.35752.reso3w83@verizon.net> <20050201093109.GA5008@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050201093109.GA5008@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502010142.43406.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out008.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:46:37 -0600 Subject: Re: Cleaning Out Ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:46:39 -0000 On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:31 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 31 Jan Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > If sysutils/pkg_cutleaves isn't right, please provide good detail > > why. > > What's the benefir over using "portsclean -D" or "portsclean -CDPP" > Works like a charm. (see man portsclean). Portsclean has nothing to do with what Matt is looking for. He is trying to remove ports that are installed but have no useful purpose. -Mike