From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  8 00:32:46 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD716A41B
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Feb 2008 00:32:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0303013C45E
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Feb 2008 00:32:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: (qmail 5154 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2008 00:32:44 -0000
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO aldan-mlp) ([216.254.65.224])
	(envelope-sender <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>)
	by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <garga@freebsdbrasil.com.br>; 8 Feb 2008 00:32:44 -0000
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc.
To: garga@freebsdbrasil.com.br
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:32:40 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200802071837.29761.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
	<12565.BUtXBwYWXFY=.1202430564.squirrel@webmail.freebsdbrasil.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <12565.BUtXBwYWXFY=.1202430564.squirrel@webmail.freebsdbrasil.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802071932.42757.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>,
	cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
	pav@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu)
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:32:46 -0000

=DE=C5=D4=D7=C5=D2 07 =CC=C0=D4=C9=CA 2008 07:29 =D0=CF, garga@freebsdbrasi=
l.com.br =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9:
> > I don't think, PORTREVISION bump is needed in these cases -- only when
> > the port itself is changed. Any changes due to build-dependencies
> > (lib-dependencies among them) should be tracked independently.
>
> I disagree with you, i believe one of the most important ports feature is
> to make sysadmins life easier. Sure, you need to read UPDATING before
> update ports, but, it makes much more sense to bump the PORTREVISION of
> dependant ports, when a lib version bumps, it makes life easier and sounds
> more organized to me.

=46ortunately, this is not a popular vote thing...

No deducible information should be manually maintained. Ever. It puts burde=
n=20
on humans, who are bad at it anyway and are bound to make mistakes, even wh=
en=20
they are meticulous enough to try.

 -mi