Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:42:48 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: =?utf-8?B?S8O2dmVzZMOhbiBHw6Fib3I=?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Makefile question Message-ID: <20050613174248.GA85674@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <42ADC155.10304@t-hosting.hu> References: <42ADC155.10304@t-hosting.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jun 13), Gábor Kövesdán said: > I'm trying to make a new port, but the software I'm porting has an > awkward configure script, and when I run ./configure --prefix=/usr/local > then every file goes to directly to /usr/local not to /usr/local/bin, > /usr/local/etc, ... Maybe the problem is not the configure script but the Makefile install target. Check to see what the generated Makefile looks like. It's possible that it uses gnumake syntax, in which case you may need USE_GMAKE=yes in the port Makefile. Or, if it doesn't install many files, you can just provide a do-install: target in your port Makefile and install the files yourself. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050613174248.GA85674>