Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:01 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why change to plist-sub for pkg-message? Message-ID: <4B550975.8090800@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4B54D17E.8000508@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B54D17E.8000508@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > Howdy, > > I've noticed a lot of commits recently to use plist-sub for pkg-message > and I'm wondering if there is some overarching purpose for this, or if > it's just general cleanup? If the latter that's fine, and I am fully > supportive of efforts to keep things neat and tidy. The reason I ask is > that I was recently sent the following PR, I don't see any benefit to > the proposed change, and the user hasn't responded to my followup request. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142847 > > > Any insight would be welcome, That particular one is questionable, but I'm sure if every post-install message is in pkg-message or files/pkg-message.in it will help with http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/122877 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B550975.8090800>