From owner-cvs-sbin Fri Sep 29 13:12:35 1995 Return-Path: owner-cvs-sbin Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA00412 for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:12:35 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA00392 ; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:12:08 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA15225; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 22:11:48 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA22433; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 22:11:47 +0200 Message-Id: <199509292011.WAA22433@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Garrett A. Wollman" cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , "Andrey A. Chernov" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 22:11:47 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > < said: > > > On a similar subject, shouldn't "MAKE_EBONES" go away? Shouldn't the > > build be based solely on the existance of the directory? > > No, certainly not! How would you make no-crypto distributions, then? > Or are you simply suggesting that everything should be controlled by a > single option? Right now we have two wrongs making a right. We _have_ to have a make with no MAKE_EBONES to make the clean distribution, followed by a nasty hack to make the tainted distribution. Why can we not have "make distribution" do it properly the first time? Sure we will need to fix the make files, but that can of worms has been brewing for a while... M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key