Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 22:11:47 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile Message-ID: <199509292011.WAA22433@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:38:22 -0700, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.FreeB SD.org> said: > > > On a similar subject, shouldn't "MAKE_EBONES" go away? Shouldn't the > > build be based solely on the existance of the directory? > > No, certainly not! How would you make no-crypto distributions, then? > Or are you simply suggesting that everything should be controlled by a > single option? Right now we have two wrongs making a right. We _have_ to have a make with no MAKE_EBONES to make the clean distribution, followed by a nasty hack to make the tainted distribution. Why can we not have "make distribution" do it properly the first time? Sure we will need to fix the make files, but that can of worms has been brewing for a while... M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509292011.WAA22433>