From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 15 10:01:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA16116 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roxy.sfo.com (0@[205.162.14.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA16110 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:01:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sommers@sfo.com) Received: from prose.sfo.com (prose.sfo.com [205.162.14.5]) by roxy.sfo.com (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id KAA15618 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:00:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980115100202.008f7ba0@roxy.sfo.com> X-Sender: sommers@roxy.sfo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:02:02 -0800 To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: William Sommers Subject: Q? - Administrivia In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Sender: owner-freebsd-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Will this change be "corrected" or should those of us who filter on Sender: go ahead and make the appropriate modifications at this point? Apologies for the public query; thought there might be others wondering... William Sommers San Francisco Online Televolve, Inc. sommers@sfo.com