From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 03:37:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB8416A41C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FF243D53 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:37:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5F3c2KG097205; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:38:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Andrew Lankford In-Reply-To: <42A32FEB.7030808@charter.net> References: <42A32FEB.7030808@charter.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/En1USs+LznRyY4shv/3" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:37:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1118806620.13898.30.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnomevfs2 and kerberos5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:37:33 -0000 --=-/En1USs+LznRyY4shv/3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 13:01 -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote: > I can't get the gnomevfs2 port to build on FreeBSD-5.4-stable. > The reason appears to be that the port depends upon libgssapi*, which > isn't on my system due to the fact that I defined NO_KERBEROS. I=20 > suppose I could undefine NO_KERBEROS and "make buildworld" yet again,=20 > but is Kerberos really necessary for this port?=20 Yes, Kerberos is necessary for GNOME these days. On 5.X and later, you need the base system krb5. > If not, would it be=20 > possible to get the gnomevfs2 port to check for NO_KERBEROS and/or=20 > NO_CRYPTO before including those dependencies in the build? This turns out to be problematic on the build clusters. Therefore, we have to fall back on the fact that a default base system includes Kerberos, and that's what we will support. Joe >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Andrew Lankford > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-/En1USs+LznRyY4shv/3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCr6Jcb2iPiv4Uz4cRAgfFAJ9S0u5Q6xqk3kNVvgt4Xxo+jU3AagCfcgSA mqK11ZQx/x41lPvYFOxXbTo= =If7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/En1USs+LznRyY4shv/3--