From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 16 22:50:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D956AB3DBC4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF39109F; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from [10.0.1.14] (h-155-4-128-242.na.cust.bahnhof.se [155.4.128.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15F0816B6F; Tue, 17 May 2016 00:50:07 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Best practice for high availability ZFS pool From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 00:50:06 +0200 Cc: Palle Girgensohn , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-Id: <726D88E6-A1DF-4E5A-ACFF-8A11E6EB3916@pingpong.net> References: <5E69742D-D2E0-437F-B4A9-A71508C370F9@FreeBSD.org> <284D58D1-1C62-4519-A46B-7D0E8326B86B@ultra-secure.de> To: Rainer Duffner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 22:50:08 -0000 > 17 maj 2016 kl. 00:47 skrev Rainer Duffner : >=20 >=20 >>> Am 17.05.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Palle Girgensohn : >>>=20 >>=20 >> We already have an infrastructure based on ZFS, and I am not sure I do tr= ust ZFS on Linux? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Wouldn=E2=80=99t start with a 20T pool on that one, TBH ;-) >=20 > There are probably a lot of quirks and workarounds needed that only those w= ho=E2=80=99ve run it for a long time are aware of (if they=E2=80=99re actual= ly aware of them at all). >=20 >=20 > That said, I=E2=80=99ve run into my own problems with zfs send now=E2=80=A6= .but only on 10.3. >=20 We are still 10.2. Are there, in your opinion, regressions in 10.3 for zfs s= end?=