From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 19:15:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BE3106564A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40B48FC0A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25780 invoked by uid 399); 17 Jan 2011 19:15:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 17 Jan 2011 19:15:45 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D34955F.9050407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:15:43 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer References: <201101170047.p0H0lFTd074412@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110117004719.D6B7F106579A@hub.freebsd.org> <20110117034847.GA11981@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer , "Sergey A. Osokin" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports] cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:15:46 -0000 On 01/17/2011 03:40, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >>> -MAN1= widl.1 wine.1 winebuild.1 winedbg.1 winedump.1 winegcc.1 \ >>> - winemaker.1 wineserver.1 wmc.1 wrc.1 >>> MAN1= msiexec.1 notepad.1 regedit.1 regsvr32.1 widl.1 wine.1 \ >>> wineboot.1 winebuild.1 winecfg.1 wineconsole.1 winedbg.1 \ >>> winedump.1 winefile.1 winegcc.1 winemaker.1 winemine.1 \ >> Could you bump PORTREVISION for these changes? > > That would be a mistake, since this change is a complete no-op when > building/installing this port. If the package is not changed, then you're right, there is no reason to bump PORTREVISION. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/