From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 27 03:15:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B35916A41C for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) Received: from tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts20.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBB343D58 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:15:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) Received: from [192.168.1.133] ([65.95.108.6]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050627031516.DRWM19894.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.1.133]>; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:15:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050626233114.G57847@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20050626233114.G57847@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3281130fd3a587b4a88a627ae305cb86@ee.ryerson.ca> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Magda Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:15:20 -0400 To: "Marc G. Fournier" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA vs SCSI ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Magda List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:15:18 -0000 On Jun 26, 2005, at 22:34, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > In fact, looking at the SATA 2.x specs, each chanell there is rated at > 300MB/s, which, again, if I could 'max out evenly', could seriously > blow away the SCSI bus itself ... > > *If* I'm reading this right ... ? Bus speed does not equal drive speed. And while yes, SATA is now approaching SCSI in bus speed, it doesn't mean that SCSI isn't standing still. A 640 MB/s bus was standardized in 2003 (though SATA is planned to go to 600MB/s in 2007): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI#Ultra-640 This has been hashed out many times over the years in comp.periph.scsi (it used to be IDE versus SCSI, not it's (S)ATA versus SCSI). A search through the archives would probably return many results. The SCSI FAQ [1] would also probably be useful. Specifically the questions: QUESTION: What are the pros and cons regarding SCSI vs IDE/ATA ? http://home.comcast.net/~SCSIguy/SCSI_FAQ/scsifaq.html#_Hlk407004722 QUESTION:Should I spend the extra money on SCSI or just get IDE? http://home.comcast.net/~SCSIguy/SCSI_FAQ/scsifaq.html#_Hlk407091459 QUESTION:Why do SCSI disks cost so much more than IDE/ATA disks? http://home.comcast.net/~SCSIguy/SCSI_FAQ/scsifaq.html#_SCSI_Cost002 [1] http://www.scsifaq.org/