From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 21 15:51:32 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E3C37B419; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA38211; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: John Baldwin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern tty_pty.c In-Reply-To: <200109212222.f8LMMPp16469@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't understand why it was curthread.. I was trying to not make that exact kind of change... Maybe I just got confused somewhere, or maybe it happenned before ai had thread pointers in that context and I never changed it back... On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > jhb 2001/09/21 15:22:25 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/kern tty_pty.c > Log: > Use the passed in thread pointer instead of curthread in calls to > selrecord() in ptcpoll(). The pre-KSE code used the passed in proc pointer > rather than curproc, and an earlier seltrue() call uses the passed in > thread and not curthread. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.90 +3 -3 src/sys/kern/tty_pty.c > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message