Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 15:03:24 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: pst@shockwave.com Cc: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, jseger@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/tix/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <199712022303.PAA06389@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199712021541.HAA27777@precipice.shockwave.com> (message from Paul Traina on Tue, 02 Dec 1997 07:41:28 -0800)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I still think the right thing to do is to just change the port PLIST on the * new ports for tcl/tk 8.0. If we decide that I made the wrong call on this, we * should stick it out for 8.0 and then when tcl8.1 comes out, we can go the * other way. I think that's fine for tcl/tk themselves, they are updated and have bug fixes and stuff (I'm assuming there aren't any interface changes...if there are, there is no argument at all). The problem is what to do with other ports that drag in version numbers from tcl/tk. My opinion is that, if they are patches to tcl/tk, then they should follow the versions of the original -- if they have their own source, they shouldn't change. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712022303.PAA06389>