From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 24 10:05:15 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7DC16A420;
	Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc)
Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758AB43D53;
	Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc)
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:05:06 +0200
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <C3FF05D58E5ACEECF4F8946F@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20050922184057.GA97327@heechee.tobez.org>
References: <200509220748.j8M7mYMT043867@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050922164036.GA97847@utopia.leeym.com>
	<20050922184057.GA97327@heechee.tobez.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:05:15 -0000

+-le 22/09/2005 20:40 +0200, Anton Berezin =E9crivait :
| On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
|> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote:
|> > tobez       2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC
|> >=20
|> >   FreeBSD ports repository
|> >=20
|> >   Modified files:
|> >     databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo=20
|> >   Log:
|> >   Update to 1.15.  Require perl from ports.  Assign maintainer to perl@.
|> >  =20
|> >   Revision  Changes    Path
|> >   1.7       +7 -11     ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile
|> >   1.3       +2 -2      ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo
|>=20
|> Just curious...
|>=20
|> Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-*
|> ports?
|=20
| Not really, it's a matter of personal preference.  I did not feel like
| having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them
| to stay unmaintained, either.  There is, I think, a better chance that
| someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to
| perl@ as opposed to ports@.

In other words, you want them maintained, but not by you ;-)

--=20
Mathieu Arnold