From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 9 04:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58709AA1F28 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC3B12D6 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aT0O4-0001yF-WD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 05:58:53 +0100 Received: from ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net ([59.167.234.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 05:58:52 +0100 Received: from newsgroups by ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 05:58:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ruben Schade Subject: Re: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:58:37 +1100 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> <86lh707dbr.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:59:08 -0000 Matthew, Brandon, Krad and Anders, Thanks for all your tips, really appreciated. Fortunately, I had the luck without hindsight to set flags for my ZFS pools that were compatible with FreeBSD, confirmed by using the FreeBSD boot media and attaching from a shell. I'm running 10.2-RELEASE now, and my pools work great. On 5/02/2016 2:21 am, krad wrote: > to add a bit more, both kernels use the same zfs core code, as do most > illumos based OS's. So there shouldn't be compatibility issues as others > have said as long as the feature flags supported by the kernel are = or > > the pool versions. Today I learned, thanks :) A real bummer Solaris is in the hands of Oracle now (well, pre-fork). GELI works fine, but native ZFS encryption and the other features since Solaris 11 on *BSD and illumos would be great. -- Cheers, Ruben Schade in s/Singapore/Sydney/ https://rubenerd.com/