From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  5 23:48:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A12B09
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2014 23:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-x231.google.com (mail-pb0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52627187D
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2014 23:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id up15so1011504pbc.22
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:48:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=+QJ2rguw1b8M2+NmhUjB62/mYd6Wrg5NhtrAdBrzLek=;
 b=sq2INCYtl4YTL7h5d+bGVhgId+bHpRuRJv1K+WusF6uApwf7FhGVtD/KI4QMfaoGPZ
 6EP/AkWK5RNyAmF2QcSoATsbSwh+95jLp/Ab1rXzHTU0VXyGgdTF738ZtW7lnPR1buVA
 RN+NSQrfJ2M/+BViKx1P71v7SfjynBsfsg2uMosVcHNBNxJuDKRrXqKygdo2C+D623D5
 ybgZ1DbOlZdZhEK0EIytxfJeLxHiHeXTXelNijZdYViVM0hJO3JTRYGn1AcvdU4wQygV
 ekGlbHrAKxSKP4raudO+KEOMP93Jf23AQciu648iqnRdyp+FBuHKv1bx4haFHO/w59Jv
 knTg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.69.20.139 with SMTP id hc11mr6568986pbd.63.1391644131925;
 Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.155.38 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:48:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <lctu4t$mju$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAN4tE39V+5wfEeeQd8RDrEHwpDovUXYPe35OEmSTLStpEnLKdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG=rPVegefXXbn13VEkCEeBzQndRzuj87BreH3mT4Scsa_VFWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4tE3-v2AKhe0LGBVY6C03h6W3GPAt5cRFCcyTNewDWBXzvwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <lctu4t$mju$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGBxaXmr3h+79Ek6jgFv1v9q3fBzGrpcVVjiy5vxPu=ef+v-4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bhyve and network virtualization
From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 23:48:52 -0000

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>wrote:

> Has anyone used VALE with bhyve yet?  It's in 10.0-RELEASE
> http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/
>
>
Just a general question on virtual network how encapsulatable (ability to
wrap standardized wrappers around them) to do the different things... the
reason for this is when I added the support for whatever networking
solution(s) we choose I want to add them in the same way we did hypervisors
(a stripped down plugin model [which will be expanded in future versions to
be more complete])... does anyone see any reason why this model could not
be used?

-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org