Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:51 -0500 From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bhyve and network virtualization Message-ID: <CAGBxaXmr3h%2B79Ek6jgFv1v9q3fBzGrpcVVjiy5vxPu=ef%2Bv-4A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <lctu4t$mju$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <CAN4tE39V%2B5wfEeeQd8RDrEHwpDovUXYPe35OEmSTLStpEnLKdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVegefXXbn13VEkCEeBzQndRzuj87BreH3mT4Scsa_VFWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN4tE3-v2AKhe0LGBVY6C03h6W3GPAt5cRFCcyTNewDWBXzvwg@mail.gmail.com> <lctu4t$mju$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>wrote: > Has anyone used VALE with bhyve yet? It's in 10.0-RELEASE > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/ > > Just a general question on virtual network how encapsulatable (ability to wrap standardized wrappers around them) to do the different things... the reason for this is when I added the support for whatever networking solution(s) we choose I want to add them in the same way we did hypervisors (a stripped down plugin model [which will be expanded in future versions to be more complete])... does anyone see any reason why this model could not be used? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXmr3h%2B79Ek6jgFv1v9q3fBzGrpcVVjiy5vxPu=ef%2Bv-4A>