Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:26:57 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: haury@sagem.fr, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM: evolutions of ctm Message-ID: <2791.823274817@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:51:36 CST." <v02140b00ad373cd93dcd@[199.183.109.242]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> haury@sagem.fr provided some patches to ctm to expant its functionality. > > First let me say "thanks" to him. > > >> possibility of local modifications to the tree : > > > >YEAHHH!!!! > > > >> before working on a file <name>, CTM first checks for the existence > >> of the file <name>#ctm. If this file exists, CTM works on it instead . > > Poul-Henning Kamp replies: > > >Hmm, what if we make it .ctm then, would that be better ? > > Now I'll add my own opinion. > 1) The ability to handle "local" modifications of a tree is extremely importa nt. > 2) However, maintaining multiple versions of a tree in the same location > [...] Sorry Rich, I think you are off on a tangent. What you propose is overengineering in my book. If you need that level of control, get the cvs tree. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2791.823274817>